Report on Governance in High-Performing US Health Systems

The American Hospital Association’s Center for Healthcare Governance has made available, freely in PDF format, its 2009 research report on trustee and CEO views on governance in high-performing health systems. The report examines the structures, practices, and cultures of community health system boards and compares them to several benchmarks of good governance.

According to the Center for Healthcare Governance, the report’s conclusions and recommendations get down to straightforward practical measures that a hospital or health system board can implement. Among others, they include blueprints for evaluation of the board’s strategic and bread-and-butter performance, plus review of membership composition. Well-noted are recommendations for essential board development and attention to community benefits. These and other areas provide a roadmap for needed change in US healthcare boards plus the rationale for why this makes sense.

This study was not designed to analyze the statistical relationships between benchmarks of good governance and system operating performance. However, it’s clear there is substantial variation in the extent to which current board structures, practices, and cultures meet these benchmarks. There are major gaps, and they are more evident in low-performing and mid-range performing systems. On-site interviews with board leaders and CEOs in ten high-performing systems documented their views on the key factors that have contributed to their systems’ success — success that, in several instances, required a major turnaround. Whether these are simply coinciding factors or cause-and-effect, the report’s authors argue that there is a very compelling argument for community health system boards to adopt the well-established principles for improvement that they present in the report.

Download the report Governance in High-Performing Health Systems: A Report on Trustee and CEO Views here.

One Response to Report on Governance in High-Performing US Health Systems

  1. Richard Gudoi Gid'Agui says:

    It is true that if the structures of the baord can demonstrate that their allegience to perform their fiduciary duties can be seen is improved firm performance the better for us to understand that the problem has been lying with the boards. may be communications also should have been researched including the way they perform on their contracts means a lot to service delivery. The baord composition relates to board committees empowered with board charters can manage their roles and tasks that benefit stakeholders and communities who can be either internal or external.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: